June 21, 2024


Think Differently

EEOC Sues Pastime Foyer for Firing Staff with Company Canine

The front of a Hobby Lobby store is pictured.

A Pastime Lobby retailer in Lakewood, Colorado. (Image by Matthew Stockman/Getty Photos)

The federal company tasked with shielding Americans from workplace discrimination has filed a criticism towards Hobby Foyer, alleging that the famously conservative crafting chain wrongfully fired an employee who relied on the use of a services pet dog.

According to the Equivalent Employment Prospect Fee, a Kansas-centered Pastime Lobby employee—identified in the submitting only as S.C.—suffers from article-traumatic stress dysfunction (PTSD), depression, and panic. She works by using a skilled medical assistance pet dog, but in accordance to the filing, she did not have one when she began doing work as a element-time clerk in late August of 2020.

S.C. worked as a cashier and numerous departments through the retail outlet in Olathe, Kansas, like unloading and stocking merchandise.

At the beginning of October, the criticism states, S.C. instructed her retail outlet manager that she was “obtaining a absolutely-properly trained clinical assistance pet to aid her with signs or symptoms similar to her panic, despair, and PTSD, and she wanted to carry the support doggy to work with her.”

The manager asked for professional medical documentation, which S.C. delivered in the variety of a letter from her mental wellness provider in assistance of her request to convey the assistance canine to function. The manager referred the matter to the company’s company human methods office, which ultimately denied S.C.’s ask for for the provider pet dog.

According to the complaint, Pastime Lobby’s denial letter said that “due to recognized safety hazards and the total nature of the company, [S.C.] may not make the most of a assistance animal while cashiering or unloading freight and stocking.”

A representative from the human assets office also allegedly “told S.C. [the service dog] was a safety hazard for the reason that another person could be allergic to the doggy, an individual might journey in excess of the puppy, or the canine may break a thing,” the grievance claims.

“Hobby Lobby did not permit S.C. to bring her support doggy to the shop to see regardless of whether it would bring about any complications,” the grievance observed.

Immediately after using a 7 days off to end training with her service canine, S.C. returned to function in late October with the canine in tow and renewed her ask for for accommodation. The Hobby Lobby supervisor sent S.C. house and explained to her she could not deliver the pet dog to get the job done she also informed her that if she couldn’t perform without the company dog, it would be regarded as “job abandonment.”

“S.C. could not do the job without having her service pet dog and did not return to get the job done,” the complaint says.

3 times afterwards, she was fired.

“Customers are allowed to deliver services canine and other dogs into Hobby Lobby Shop #75 in Olathe, Kansas, inspite of the alleged safety hazards the enterprise cited in denying S.C.’s request for accommodation,” the complaint famous.

The EEOC contends that Hobby Lobby’s alleged firing of S.C. violates the Individuals with Disabilities Act (ADA), which prohibits discrimination based mostly on incapacity.

“The EEOC submitted fit in U.S. District Courtroom for the District of Kansas soon after to start with attempting to attain a pre-litigation settlement via its conciliation pro­cess,” the company stated Friday in a press release.

The EEOC alleges that Hobby Foyer acted with “malice or with reckless indifference” to S.C.’s rights, and is seeking again pay out, compensatory and punitive damages on behalf of the former employee. S.C. is also asking for her task back again, and the company is trying to get “injunctive relief to reduce long term discrimina­tion.”

The EEOC grievance is only the latest higher-profile circumstance from Interest Foyer, which has built a name for by itself pushing back again against federal law: it famously opposed the Economical Treatment Act’s contraception mandate, and in 2014 gained the lawful battle in the Supreme Court docket. In 2021, an Illinois appellate court upheld a $220,000 award to Meggan Sommerville, a 20-as well as year staff of Passion Lobby and a transgender woman who had been denied accessibility to the women’s restroom.

Also in 2021, Interest Foyer was subjected to a forfeiture get from the federal authorities around an historic tablet with origins in Iraq that had been smuggled into the U.S. and eventually bought by the firm.

Reps for Interest Lobby did not right away reply to Regulation&Crime’s request for remark.

Go through the EEOC’s complaint, under.

[Image via Matthew Stockman/Getty Images.]

Have a suggestion we ought to know? [email protected]