April 13, 2024


Think Differently

Ontario delays new rules on recruitment businesses just after industry outcry

Open this picture in gallery:

Ontario Premier Doug Ford attends concern period at Queen’s Park in Toronto on Nov. 2.Chris Youthful/The Canadian Push

The Ontario governing administration is delaying and amending new licensing guidelines for staffing agencies, soon after the industry expressed worry that the needs have been too onerous for compact recruiting companies.

Ontario announced in July that companies in the recruiting and staffing industry would require to utilize for licences by Jan. 1, 2024, pay back $750 application costs and put up $25,000 letters of credit that the authorities could draw on, if wanted, to go over wages owed to employees.

The government claimed the rules had been wanted to crack down on agencies exploiting temporary and vulnerable staff. For instance, a short-term staffing agency could collect dollars from an employer and then fall short to pay out the individual they despatched to do get the job done.

But nearly all impartial firms that helped persons obtain jobs – or helped businesses obtain new recruits – were being lined less than the new polices. Compact recruiting corporations in unique explained coming up with $25,000 on limited see would put their organizations at hazard and value hundreds of bucks in extra once-a-year fees.

On Thursday, Ontario Labour Minister David Piccini wrote to recruiters to tell them implementation of the new rules would be delayed right up until July 1, giving the ministry time to rewrite the guidelines to handle their worries. His place of work verified the plan adjust on Friday.

“While the the vast majority of recruiters and non permanent support businesses in Ontario adhere to the regulations, inspections by my ministry have constantly uncovered corporations charging unlawful costs, having to pay persons beneath the bare minimum wage, and denying them other fundamental legal rights,” Mr. Piccini wrote in the letter.

He continued: “Given the complexity of the probable influence on the recruitment and quick-expression work sector, which are critical to our economic climate, Ontario is delaying implementation of the prerequisite to be licenced to July 1, 2024 and I have instructed the ministry to take into account additional adjustments to the framework.”

He reported potential changes could involve narrowing the scope of who requires to deliver a letter of credit rating, as properly as maybe accepting choice sorts of security.

Recruiters said they welcomed the hold off.

“This is wonderful news for the staffing industry, specifically tiny enterprises,” claimed Suky Sodhi, president of Skilled Collection Inc. She claimed the extension presents companies these kinds of as hers time to talk to with the ministry to have a reasonable result that also shields vulnerable workers.

Jason Noble, founder of the Noble Look for Team, said he hopes the regulations are much more focused. “Unlike non permanent staffing organizations, long lasting placement recruiters (this sort of as me) really do not ever pay staff members or demand fees, but we ended up addressed like we do,” he stated.

The procedures announced in July were being prepared right after consultations with the field team Association of Canadian Search, Work and Staffing Providers (ACSESS), which has also suggested on rules in British Columbia and Alberta.

In August, ACSESS explained to The World it supported the policies. On Friday, the group explained it also supported the hold off and changes to suitable varieties of protection.

“ACSESS is quite pleased with Minister Piccini’s decision to hold off implementation,” said Mary McIninch, the group’s govt director. She mentioned the group would function in partnership with the Surety Association of Canada to recommend the govt that a surety bond really should be an satisfactory alternative to a letter of credit.

Some recruiters are exempt from the new licensing specifications, these as individuals functioning for unions, charities or the federal government.